Niccolò Machiavelli and Desiderius Erasmus Essay

Machiavelli and Erasmus were twain humanists, but had very different points of view. Machiavelli whose written material was from the Italian humanists view, when Erasmus wrote from the points of view of Christian humanist in Europe may be one of reasons for huge differences in Machiavellis and Erasmus thoughts. However, these two styles of humanism provided us means to generalize about the implication of the Renaissance.(303).According to Lawrence in his book Culture and Values A batch of the Humanities, Machiavelli sees Christianitys role in politics as a tragedy that destroys the force out of the order to govern.(302). In other words, the perform interfered deeply in everything, especially in state management. A good example of this is heat content VIII, who ruled England from 1509 to 1547 and remains one of English most famous and polemical king because of his disarticulate from his first wife, Catherine of Aragon. total heat VIII wanted to divorce from Catherine that followed by marriage to Anne Boleyn. But, the Church of Rome did not allow him to do what he had wanted for so long, about six years.In 1534, Henry VIII broke with the Church of Rome over his divorce, found his consume church and made himself Head of the Church of England. Clearly, Henry VIII who was a king of England, had no ability of divorcing his wife without the Church of Romes sanction unless he cut off all the connections from Rome. That is to say that the Church had an immense large religious influence on much of the power of a state to govern, in other words, politics. From Machiavellis point of view, the state needs to restrict the power of the Church, allowing it to exercise is office only in the spiritual realm.(302). I strongly agree with Machiavelli that there are ever so so much conflicts between the politics and the church that these two herculean influences can not share power and influence.In the Christians view, Erasmus felt that learning from the past could be wedded to the Christian tradition to create an instrument for social reform.(303). He realized the religious corruption, and bitter taunted the barrenness of scholarship provided by the Church and excessively superstitious manners. Erasmuss ideal which was combining religion and politics seems to be impossible at that time, even at the present.On the other hand, Machiavelli theory does not worry about morality and is cruel. The prince, a favorite Machiavellis illustration, demonstrated clear his point of view The prince must be as sly as the fox and as brutal as the lion. and cruelty or delusion is permissible judicious cruelty consolidates power and discourages revolution.(302). These two typically statements explains wherefore Machiavellis reputation is very bad toward the Catholic Church. Nevertheless, Machiavellis realism has a strong attraction to lots of politicians such as catnap and Catherine the Great of Russia.In brief, although there are reverse attitudes between M achiavelli and Erasmus, both mens views brought us glimpses towards the meaning of the Renaissance and the general judgment of the evolution of a culture.Works CitedLawrence Cunningham and John Reich, Culture and Values A Survey of the Humanities, Thomson Wadsworth, 2002.