Appeasement Essay -- History European Historical Essays

Appeasement The task of explaining why appeasement, has been continuously addressed by historians all over the years. To date, there is still no single cause identified. Nonetheless there is besides a familiar consensus amongst historians that the frightful events of world state of struggle one, distilled a sense of fear and sorrowfulness amongst British society, and consequently Britain strived to prevent any future war, through any(prenominal) means necessary. In the aftermath of World warf atomic number 18 1, lay a mutual understanding between the British government activity and society that neer again should a catastrophe such as World struggle 1 occur, it was described as the war to end all wars reinforcing the find out that it was a cataclysmic event which should never be re-en work oned upon society. British exoteric became disillusioned with the use of force in international relations and as a result sought an approach consisting of an effective system of embodied security. In post war society anti-war books, films and poems all became increasingly advantageously liked and several pacifist pressure groups were formed with the sole betoken of achieving peaceful solutions to international problems. These groups were known as The stay Pledge Union, The Peace Society and the No More War Movement. World War 1 essentially left Britain in a state of mourning, and accordingly thousands of war monuments were erected, and an annual day of mourning and remembrance was established, known as medical record Sunday. This was an attempt to pay tribute to those heroes lost in the war and to act as a subtle reminder of the devastation caused by the war in a bid to prevent any future contest. As a result of the desolation a common consensus was becoming seeming(a) amid the general public, which was that, there were no clear societal gains from the war and the self-evident economic, and political decline of the country showed no gains in that sector eithe r. thence the reduction of arms and peace became vote winners in elections. Appeasement ignore be defined as a disposition to avoid conflict by judicious concession and negotiation. Neville Chamberlain noted that the British public would not wish nor accept another war. Therefore the British government sought to follow a policy of appeasement. However, everyone did not share the acceptation of the policy of appeasement. Looking on with hindsight many historians have condemned the actions of Chamberlai... ...nland. There are mixed opinions towards this policy, and the question why historians have debated appeasement continuously over the passing decades. Many believe that Chamberlains policy of appeasement was fuled by a desire to do everything in his power possible to avoid war, and his sentiment that all European powers shared the dame feeling. The catastrophic events of World War one set in a deep fear and execration of war among many. It is also felt that Chamberlain follo wed the policy of appeasement as a means to buy some time as he clear that British defences were hopelessly inadequate, as British military strength had been greatly reduced due to the commitment of disarmament. Even at the time of the Anschluss Britain was tell unprepared for war. Therefore to conclude, whatever the reasons for the continual policy of appeasement, it can be said that appeasement with the sole aim of preventing war did not succeed, however what it was seen to do was prolong the inevitable. Many strongly feel that the continual demands of Hitler were flared by the lack of opposition, and his continual greed for expansion, his demands were rarely attacked, simply given into with puny hesitancy.