Alexander II and Reform

black lovage II was known as a reforming czar. Was he primarily a crusader? Alexander II executed gayy reforms during his quantify in world-beater but did he reform for the sake of reforming? In the essay I will conclude whether or not Alexander had objectives in which reforming unaccompanied partook as a secondary effect, and if so, what was he primarily?From a political point of face the landlords most likely opposed the peasant firing reform in 1861 (Berghorn, 2009) which affected the Russian countryside. The landlords felt that they were being robbed of their property, the serfs. These were awarded plentiful citizenship. (Lovett, 2003) This exponent rush made Alexander II less unforced to reform. However many of the serfs couldnt leave the land they previously were bound to and so their freedom only existed legally as many remained, bound, to their landlords. (Lovett, 2003) This was as such a good solution to Alexander II as it inspired faith in some peasants that refo rms were coming whilst sending a message to the landlords that their authority wasnt threatened.From a military point of view Alexander had seen Russia take heavy casualties in the Crimean war and as he feared Europes more militarily advanced countries gaining influence he started in 1857 to execute the army and naval reforms. (Troyat, 1992) (Lovett, 2003) This should therefore have been a very appealing option to Alexander II as he could claim the reforms in his own name and at the same time preserve his power.From an economic point of view the Russian Empire was outdated. In order for Russia under Alexander II to play an important grapheme as an economic power they had to industrialize. (http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Russia) The emancipation reform could certainly have been an attempt to as well as pleasing the serfs demanding freedom blow up a movement of urbanization and increased factory production. In that hotshot the emancipation reform could have served yet anoth er cause of essay to westernize and making it await like Alexander was a man trying to please his people.From an ideologic point of view the theses of Alexander reforming secondarily is supported by the fact of some peasants and middle-class citizens adopting the socialist ideas of Karl Marx. This ideological standpoint was dangerous to Alexander II as it included an trim down of the czars power. (http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx) Another ideological group dangerous to Alexander was the nihilists who later on came to practice terrorism which threatened his life. (Radzinskij, 2008) Contradicting the reasons to reform was the Jewish-Orthodox Christian church that could not agree to these reforms and had given him his power combine with his upbringing which had taught him to preserve royal power as a indigenous initiative.From a social point of view czar Alexander might have reformed as a reaction to his fathers harsh policies imposed on the people as this was arguably a rea son the pressured situation had emerged. An example of this would be the educational reform. (Lovett, 2003) Alexander excessively introduced a judicial reform based in the French transcription which greatly simplified criminal matter and rendered the different parties involved in a judiciary process more equal. (Troyat, 1992) The latter reform should sensibly have upped Alexander standings with many groups and fulfilled the cause of making him seem like a reformer in order to soothe pedestal group such as the nihilists mentioned above.